Section 508 vs ADA

Section 508 governs ICT developed, procured, maintained or used by federal agencies. Its revised standards incorporate WCAG 2.0 A and AA and other ICT requirements. ADA Title II covers state and local government, with a WCAG 2.1 AA web/mobile rule. Title III concerns private public accommodations; DOJ has not adopted the same uniform WCAG regulation for that title. Federal funding and federal procurement are different triggers.

Side-by-side comparison

DimensionSection 508ADA
Source statuteSection 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. § 794d)Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. §§ 12101+)
Who is coveredFederal agency ICT; suppliers through applicable ICT procurement and contract requirementsTitle I: employers (15+ employees). Title II: state/local government. Title III: places of public accommodation.
Web technical standardWCAG 2.0 Level AA (per 2018 Section 508 Refresh)Title II: WCAG 2.1 Level AA (28 C.F.R. § 35.200). Title III: no uniform DOJ WCAG regulation; applicable remedies, settlements and contracts can specify a target.
Enforcement bodyU.S. Access Board (rule); GSA (federal acquisition); each agency (compliance)U.S. Department of Justice (Title II/III) + private right of action
Private right of action?Section 508 provides administrative complaints and civil actions within the statute’s enforcement scopeYes — individuals can sue under Title II and Title III
Key deadlineRevised standards are in force; review current procurement termsTitle II: April 26, 2027 / April 26, 2028 (extended one year by April 2026 IFR)
PenaltiesAdministrative complaints, civil enforcement within statutory scope, and procurement remediesTitle II: injunctive relief, compensatory damages, attorneys' fees, loss of federal funding. Title III: injunctive relief + attorneys' fees (state laws add damages — e.g., $4,000 per Unruh violation in CA)
Procurement obligationYES — federal acquisition rules (FAR Part 39, 36 CFR Part 1194) require Section 508 conformance in IT purchasesNO direct procurement requirement, but covered entities must ensure third-party tools are accessible to satisfy Title II/III
Documentation expectedVPAT (Voluntary Product Accessibility Template) / ACR (Accessibility Conformance Report)Accessibility statement; remediation roadmap; conformance testing records

When both apply

A state university can have Title II responsibilities and Section 504 obligations because of federal financial assistance. Funding does not automatically bring its website under Section 508, although a state policy or ICT contract may adopt those standards. A supplier building a federal agency system should evaluate the requirements in that procurement, while separately reviewing obligations for its own business. Record each framework, covered system and evidence requirement before choosing a target.

Official sources: section508.gov · ada.gov

FAQ

What is the difference between Section 508 and ADA?
Section 508 governs ICT that federal agencies develop, procure, maintain or use. Suppliers must meet applicable procurement and contract requirements. Federal funding alone is not a Section 508 trigger. ADA Title II covers state and local government; Title III covers public accommodations, with website coverage differing by jurisdiction. Section 504 is a separate nondiscrimination framework.
Does Section 508 use WCAG 2.0 or 2.1?
The Revised Section 508 Standards incorporate WCAG 2.0 Level A and AA, subject to their scope and exceptions, and include requirements beyond web content. A contract can require more. Check the actual procurement requirements rather than treating a WCAG-only report as a complete Section 508 assessment.
Which standard do I need to meet?
First identify the applicable law and contract. The ADA Title II web and mobile rule specifies WCAG 2.1 AA. DOJ has not adopted an equivalent uniform WCAG regulation for Title III. HHS has a separate Section 504 web rule. EAA coverage depends on listed product and service categories and applicable exceptions, not merely having EU customers. Document each applicable requirement and the evidence needed to evaluate it.